eesier vs Lusha
Lusha is the global go-to for B2B email + phone lookup — pay-per-credit. eesier is the agent that uses similar data and acts — no credits, no manual operation.
Lusha is an Israeli B2B contact enrichment platform (emails, phones, titles) with a pay-per-credit model, popular for extracting data from LinkedIn and websites. eesier is an autonomous AI SDR — built-in 60M+ company database, web research per lead, AI that writes and qualifies — at $297/month flat with no credits.
What's the difference between eesier and Lusha?
Lusha sells contact credits (you operate manually). eesier is an agent that researches + writes + sends + qualifies.
| Aspect | Lusha | eesier |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Contact enrichment | Autonomous AI SDR |
| Model | Pay-per-credit | Flat monthly price |
| Sends email | No | Yes |
| No | Yes | |
| Pricing | USD 29-69/user + credits | $297/month total |
Pay-per-credit vs flat pricing
Lusha charges license + credits per revealed contact. High-volume operations blow the budget. eesier is flat monthly with no per-contact charge.
For 1,000 contacts/month: Lusha can run USD 500-1,500 depending on tier. eesier: flat price, no usage caps.
How eesier replaces the Lusha workflow
No credit-by-credit lookups. You set ICP in eesier; it searches the database, researches contacts via web, and prospects — all in one agent.
Instead of: buy contacts in Lusha → export → import into sender → operate. With eesier: set ICP and the agent executes end-to-end.
Combining Lusha and eesier
Rarely worth it. Edge case: prospecting in markets where Lusha has unique coverage eesier doesn't.
For most use cases, eesier alone solves it.
Perguntas frequentes
Does Lusha have good Brazil coverage?
Can I use the Lusha extension inside eesier?
No credits?
Free trial?
بسيط ومباشر
معظم الشركات تخفي أسعارها. تنشئ خططاً معقدة، وجداول مقارنة، وخصومات وهمية، ونصوصاً دقيقة لا يقرأها أحد. ليس إيزيَر. لا حيل. الحقيقة فقط.
خطة واحدة. بدون التزام. إلغاء في أي وقت.
eesier starts at $297/month — less than the cost of a sales intern and a fraction of what a stack of separate prospecting tools would cost.